skip to main content skip to related links skip to website navigation links
VTA Home
Customer Service Phone: (408) 321-2300


   Related Links


   Board of Directors

   Standing Committees

   Advisory Committees

   Policy Advisory Boards

   Government Affairs

       Legislative Programs
       Policy Updates
       Transportation Funding







Citizens Advisory Committee

Wednesday, May 10, 2006
4:30 PM

Conference Room B-104
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
3331 North First Street
San Jose, California

Minutes

1. CALL TO ORDER

The Regular Meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) was called to order at    4:35 p.m. by Chairperson Schulter in Conference Room B-104, Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), 3331 North First Street, San Jose, California. 

ROLL CALL

Members Present 
Stephen Blaylock, Vice Chairperson
Don Burnett
Chris Elias
Ellen Fletcher
Ray Hashimoto
Roberta Hughan
Gaye Morando
Jennifer Paedon
Charlotte Powers
Sally Probst
Connie Rogers 
Martin Schulter, Chairperson
Noel Tebo

Members Absent
Irene Hsu
Luis Mendez
Margaret Okuzumi
Patricia Saucedo

A quorum was present.

  
2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS

There were no Public Presentations.

Member Hashimoto took his seat at 4:35 p.m.
  
3. Committee Staff Report

Quarterly Report from the General Manager

Michael T. Burns, General Manager, noted his commitment to report to the Advisory Committees every three to four months.   Mr. Burns introduced the following three new VTA staff members and noted their background:  Bill Lopez, Chief Administrative Officer; Mike Hursh, Maintenance Deputy Director; and Dan Smith, Operations Deputy Director.  

Mr. Burns thanked the CAC Members who attended the VTA Tour and noted the positive feedback from attendees.   He extended the invitation to those who were not able to attend and noted that VTA could provide the tours again if there is a lot of interest from the Committees.

Mr. Burns reported that VTA ridership in March 2006 has improved when compared to the same time last year.   Bus ridership has increased 6 percent and light rail showed a strong increase of 31 percent.   Mr. Burns attributed the positive increases to the staggering prices of gas and to the slow but sustained improvement in the economy.

On the Performance Audit, Mr. Burns advised the Committee that the Request for Proposals (RFP) is now public and proposals are due by the end of May 2006.   Six firms attended in the pre-proposal meeting.  Mr. Burns stated that he is inviting the Chairpersons of all Advisory Committees to participate in the selection panel for the consultant team.  He noted that staff intends to bring the recommendation for the consultant team to the Board of Directors for approval at their August or September 2006 Regular Meeting.

Mr. Burns noted that the Board of Directors established the Project Advisory Committee to make recommendations to the Board regarding the Expenditure Plan.   The Committee has met on a regular basis and the next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 11, 2006, VTA Auditorium, at 5:30 p.m.  Mr. Burns stated that the Committee expects to make a recommendation to the Board at its June 15, 2006 special meeting.

Mr. Burns stated that an Employee Survey was conducted to examine the overall employment environment at VTA.   The majority of VTA employees feel appreciated, value their jobs, and are proud of the work they do.  The survey identified communication as an improvement area.  Mr. Burns reported that VTA will develop an action plan with methods to improve communication both internally and  externally.  Mr. Burns advised that the results are available on the VTA website and added that interested Members may obtain a copy of the survey results upon request. 

Mr. Burns reported that VTA is in its ninth month in the two-year budget.   The Board adjusted the budget two months ago to account for increases in fuel costs and interest expense.  There were not any negative impacts due to the improving economy and stronger sales tax receipts.  Mr. Burns informed CAC that VTA reserves are back under 15 percent.

Mr. Burns noted that on May 17, 2006, the River Oaks Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Ribbon Cutting Ceremony will take place.   He encouraged CAC Members to attend.

Mr. Lawson advised the Committee that after the meeting, interested Members are welcome to view the River Oaks Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge.

Kurt Evans, Government Affairs Manager, reported that on Friday, May 5, 2006, the Legislature approved a comprehensive and compromise Infrastructure Bond Package that will go before the voters in November 2006.   It was a culmination of almost a year’s worth of debate within the legislature about using General Obligation Bonds to begin addressing California’s growing infrastructure needs.  The size of the bond package is  $37 billion, smaller than the governor proposed $70 billion in his strategic growth plan in January 2006 and the proposed $50 billion in March 2006.   Mr. Evans explained that the lower figure ($37 billion) is the number that Republicans agreed to as they do not favor using debt to fund infrastructure and prefers a pay as you go approach. 

Mr. Evans stated that the legislature focused the bond package on four areas major areas:   Transportation with approximately $20 billion, Flood Prevention with approximately $4 billion, Affordable Housing with $2.8 billion, and Education for approximately 10.5 billion.  Mr. Evans advised that these four would appear as four separate bond measures in the November 2006 ballot. 

Transportation is divided into thirteen existing and new programs.   The key existing programs include $2 billion for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), $750 million for State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), $1 billion for State-Local Partnership Program, and  $400 million for Intercity Rail Program.  The new programs include $4.5 billion for Corridor Mobility Program, which would fund huge highway projects that has inter-regional significance.  There is $3.1 billion for Goods Movement, which is a combination of capital improvement to corridors that has heavy freight traffic, air quality improvement for ports, and port security.  Public Transit Capital include  $3.6 billion and funding for this program is flexible that will be allocated to transit operators by formula.  Lastly, $1billion is set for Transit Security.

Mr. Evans advised CAC that the Board adopted advocacy principles to guide VTA’s efforts with regards to the Infrastructure Bonds.   Mr. Evans stated that what the Legislature approved is similar to the Board adopted guiding principles.  He noted that the legislative delegation came through to make sure that the final product of the bond package addressed the VTA Board identified important transportation needs in Santa Clara County.   Mr. Evans reiterated that a majority vote by the voters on November 2006 is needed to approve the bonds and start the flow of monies.

Mr. Evans distributed two handouts entitled:   General Obligation Infrastructure Bonds:  November 2006 Ballot and Senate Bill 1266 (Perata):  Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006.

Member Tebo commented that CAC was very happy with their first impression of Mr. Burns. 

Mr. Burns stated that there is a lot of potential in VTA and good people.   He noted the existing programs and programs that will be launched such as the Community Bus and the Comprehensive Operational Analysis, to name a few.

Chairperson Schulter expressed his appreciation to Mr. Burns for attending CAC to provide a report.

Upon inquiry of Member Powers, Mr. Evans responded that the Infrastructure Bond has a campaign to support its passing.   He stated that he is not aware of an opposition campaign.  Mr. Evans stated his opinion that the four main programs of the Infrastructure Bond will pass due to Californian’s recognition that these infrastructure needs should be addressed. 

Member Burnett expressed concern about the repayment of bonds and inquired about the philosophy or plans on how it will be paid.   Mr. Evans stated that there is an understanding in the State Administration and Legislature that the State has only a certain amount of bonding capacity.  Mr. Evans noted that the Administration and Legislature have done a good job in analyzing how much bonds the State Budget could accommodate. 

Mr. Lawson invited CAC to the River Oaks Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Opening Ceremony scheduled for May 17, 2006.    He reiterated that interested Members could go to the bridge after the meeting and transportation will be provided to those who do not want to walk to the bridge.   

Mr. Lawson directed attention to the handout on the table regarding the update on the Downtown San Jose Light Rail closure.   Mr. Lawson stated that staff anticipates that the San Antonio Light Rail Station will be open in time for the San Jose Grand Prix. 

Mr. Lawson stated that VTA held its Cinco de Mayo Celebration at the North Yard, as part of VTA’s Diversity Program, where Board Members Chavez, Kniss and Ex-Officio Board Member McLemore were in attendance. 

Mr. Lawson stated that the Project Advisory Committee met on April 27, 2006 at the Milpitas City Hall.   They received presentations regarding the BART Extension Project and presentations from the cities of Milpitas, San Jose, and Santa Clara.  He added that Jim Pierson, City of Fremont, provided a brief verbal presentation as well.  The next meeting is scheduled for May 11, 2006, 5:30 p.m., at the VTA Auditorium and the Committee will receive presentations on light rail projects, Airport People Mover, and Bus Rapid transit.

Mr. Lawson advised CAC of the opening of the 1996 Measure B Project - 85/101 North Interchange Project on May 24, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.  The Ceremony will be held at VTA North Yard.

Mr. Lawson noted that the Board received presentations on the “Do the Math Presentation” and “Programming and Delivery of Projects.”   Mr. Lawson also noted that the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 265 agreed to a different rate structure for Community Bus Operators in April 2006.  This is a major milestone for VTA as the agreement enables VTA to provide a flexible and more cost effective service.  He noted that ATU should be commended for their vision and their ability to view how future transportation is moving. 

Member Elias requested that staff provide Committees a calendar of festivities/activities to provide opportunity for Members to participate.

  
4. Chairpersons Report

Chairperson Schulter thanked Vice Chairperson Blaylock for facilitating the April 2006 CAC Meeting.   He welcomed Member Paedon to CAC. 

Chairperson Schulter referred to the VTA Tour and thanked staff for the opportunity. He noted that the Tour was an eye opening experience of the depth and breadth of VTA as an organization. 

Chairperson Schulter advised CAC that staff recommends replacement of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP) seat to Building Owners and Managers Association – Silicon Valley (BOMA), and it will go before the Board for approval in June 2006.   It is anticipated that CAC will have a representative from BOMA at the June 2006 CAC Meeting.

  

BUSINESS REFERRED TO COMMITTEE BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS/GENERAL MANAGER

CONSENT AGENDA

5. Minutes of April 12, 2006

Member Elias referred to Page 3 of 7, second to the last paragraph, and noted that his specific comment regarding benchmarking was to “not limit the scope of study to only transportation but look at the best in class.”   He noted that if the airline or shipping model is the best in class, it should be used as a model and not be limited it to the same model of transportation. 

M/S/C (Fletcher/Burnett) to approve the Minutes of April 12, 2006.

  
6. CAC Quarterly Attendance Report

M/S/C (Fletcher/Burnett) to review the CAC Quarterly Attendance Report.

  
7. Congestion Management Program Financial Audit, Fiscal Year 2005

M/S/C (Fletcher/Burnett) to review the Congestion Management Program Financial Audit, Fiscal Year 2005.
  
8. Proactive CMP Reviewed and Approved Projects Quarterly Status Report January through March 2006

M/S/C (Fletcher/Burnett) to review the Proactive CMP Reviewed and Approved Projects Quarterly Status Report January through March 2006.

  

REGULAR AGENDA

9. FY 2007 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Project Priorities

John Sighamony, Transportation Planner, provided a brief overview.   He noted that the TDA Article 3 funds are distributed on a population basis.   VTA splits it in two categories:  70 percent in Guarantee Fund, which is distributed by population and 30 percent for Bicycle Expenditure Program (BEP). 

John Sighamony noted Attachment A illustrates the projects for this cycle.  Mr. Sighamony pointed out that the City of Sunnyvale is the only one that requested monies for the BEP for their Sunnyvale Borregas Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge in the amount of $440,000, thus leaving a balance of unprogrammed $160,364.  The City of Sunnyvale is also requesting for a postponement of repayment of the $86,000 loan that was supposed to be paid this year.  The Town of Los Gatos is requesting an additional $30,000 to complete their College Avenue Pathway Repairs Project.  Mr. Sighamony explained that the Town of Los Gatos would be repaying the $30,000 next year by not taking any TDA funds.

Member Paedon inquired if borrowing funds is a common practice.   Mr. Sighamony noted that it has been done in the past.  He explained that it was done this cycle since there was only one BEP request and there was money left over.

Mr. Lawson added that it is VTA’s advantage to be able to move money around and fund projects that are ready.   He noted that this ability to use the money creatively makes VTA successful in delivering projects. 

Member Paedon commented that this is a very good use of funds. 

 Upon inquiry of Member Probst, Mr. Sighamony responded that the repayment is done in the next cycle where Cities who requested an advance would not get any money on the next cycle.

M/S/C (Fletcher/Morando) to review and recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve project priorities for the FY 2007 Countywide Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Program. 

  
10. Recommended FY 06-07 Congestion Management Program Work Program and Budget

Stephen Flynn, Sr. Management Analyst, noted that VTA is the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for Santa Clara County.   The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is a separate and distinct program separate from transit enterprise, which gets funding from planning grants and member agency fees. 

The Joint Powers Agreement for the CMA requires an annual budget and work program that will be distributed to all Member Agencies.   Mr. Flynn noted that Attachment A illustrates the detailed Work Program highlighting the following:  Regional Lifeline Transportation Program, countywide pedestrian issues and needs assessment study, participate and partner in the El Camino/Grand Boulevard Project, various corridor and planning studies, and develop Transit Sustainability Policy.

Mr. Flynn noted that since the program uses Member Agencies’ monies, a six-year financial plan is developed.   Attachment B illustrates the Strategic Six-Year Financial plan from FY 06-07 to FY 11-12.  The attachment identifies the trends, needs, and the resources required to deliver or initiate projects in the Work Program.  Mr. Flynn noted that for FY 06-07 approximately $4.4 million is needed to provide these services.  Staff estimates that at the end of the year, the fund balance will be approximately $750,000. 

Upon inquiry of Member Probst, Mr. Flynn responded that bonding or borrowing from the previous sales tax is precluded by the law as the CMP is separate and distinct and monies could not be co-mingled.          

M/S/C (Probst/Powers) to review the Recommended FY 2006-07 Congestion Management Program Work Program and Budget.

  
11. Converting the June 2006 Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Into a Workshop on the Committees Duties and Responsibilities as the 2000 Measure A Watchdog Committee

Mr. Lawson noted that canceling the June CAC meeting and replacing it with a workshop would provide the Committee the opportunity to discuss the Committee’s role as the 2000 Measure A Oversight Committee.   Mr. Lawson noted the potential topics for the workshop, including: 

  • Information on the 2000 Measure A Ballot Language
  • Briefing on the Committee’s legal responsibilities
  • Report on 2000 Measure A project accomplishments to date
  • Update on the Project Advisory Committee progress
  • Review how audit procedures will be approached
  • Discuss public hearing venue and format, and
  • Discuss reporting methods. 

Member Probst requested that the Committee receive information regarding the monies that have been expended and work that has been completed prior to the Workshop.

Member Elias suggested including in the workshop a discussion about access to independent audit services. 

Member Powers suggested including in the workshop a discussion about the Oversight Committee’s budget process.

M/S/C (Tebo/Fletcher) to cancel CAC’s June 7, 2006 Regular Meeting and replace it with a Workshop Meeting.

  
12. CAC Work Plan

On order of Chairperson Schulter, there being no objection, the Committee reviewed the CAC Work Plan.

  

OTHER

13. Announcements

Member Hashimoto noted he will be attending a celebration after the CAC meeting where Jim Harper would be awarded as Central YMCA’s Volunteer of the Year.   He also noted that his company HMH Engineers is now celebrating its 30th year anniversary.

  
14. ADJOURNMENT

On order of Chairperson Schulter, there being no objection, the Meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

 

Elaine F. Baltao, Board Assistant
VTA Board of Directors

  

 NOTE: M/S/C MEANS MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.