skip to main content skip to related links skip to website navigation links
VTA Home
Customer Service Phone: (408) 321-2300


   Related Links


   Board of Directors

   Standing Committees

   Advisory Committees

   Policy Advisory Boards

   Government Affairs

       Legislative Programs
       Policy Updates
       Transportation Funding






Committee for Transit Accessibility

Wednesday, August 13, 2003
1:00 p.m.

Auditorium
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
3331 North First Street
San Jose, California

Minutes

1.

CALL TO ORDER

The Regular Meeting of the Committee for Transit Accessibility (CTA) was called to order at 1:08 p.m. by Vice Chairperson Grant in Building A, Auditorium, Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), 3331 North First Street, San Jose, California.

ROLL CALL

Members Present                       Members Present

Jeannette Bruntz                            Martin Lasich

Emma Eljas                                    Laura Michels

Linda Gallo                                     Aaron Morrow

Sandra Gouveia                             Marian Otis

David Grant, Vice Chairperson    Frederico S. Orillaneda

Katie Heatley (Ex-Officio)             Barbara Rhodes

Marjorie Jensen                             Thomas Slack

David Julian                                    Barbara Stahl

LeNae Liebetrau     

        

Members Absent

Cynthia Aleman

Michelle HammCiric

Maryjane Naughten

Randy Tamez, Chairperson

 

A quorum was present.

  
2.

INTRODUCTION OF AUDIENCE MEMBERS

Received introductions from the audience including:   Tom Giuffre, American Association of Retired Persons (AARP); Terri Applegate, Silicon Valley Independent Living Center (SVILC); Bill Capps, VTA Service Planning; Edna Pampy, VTA Accessible Services; Elaine Baltao, VTA Office of the Board Secretary; Carolyn Grattan-Aiello, VTA Human Resources; Natalie Wells, VTA Accessible Services; Gary Hunnicutt, Outreach and David Ledwitz, VTA Accessible Services.

  
3.

PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS

Terri Applegate, Silicon Valley Independent Living Center (SVILC), requested an American Disabilities Act (ADA) Service Map and noted that the ADA Service Map sent to her was different from the map distributed to the VTA Board of Directors. 

Ms. Applegate expressed her concern regarding the discrepancy between the information distributed to the public and the information distributed to the VTA Board of Directors.   Ms. Applegate expressed her concern regarding the reduction in work hours and loss of benefits to Paratransit Outreach drivers.

Member Julian expressed his concern regarding the reduction in work hours and the loss of benefits for Paratransit Outreach drivers.   Member Julian noted the negative impact to the drivers as well as to the customers.

  
4.

Minutes of July 9, 2003

M/S/C (Morrow/Gouveia) on a vote of 15 ayes, 0 noes and 1 abstention to approve the Minutes of July 9, 2003.   Member Julian abstained from the vote.

  
5.

Conducting Committee Business

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Conducting Committee Business Report was deferred.

  
6.

Eligibility Certification Program Update

Edna Pampy, VTA Accessible Services, provided a brief overview on the Eligibility Certification Program Update.   Ms. Pampy noted that the new Eligibility Certification Program contract became effective with disabled services at Orthopedic Hospital on July 1, 2003, and noted that their offices are centrally located at 4030 Moorpark Avenue, Suite 102, in San Jose.  Ms. Pampy noted that preplanning, office setup, intensive training and coordination efforts with disabled services at Orthopedic Hospital, Outreach, and VTA staff started months prior to the July 2003 date to ensure a smooth eligibility process for both new and re-certifying applicants.  Ms. Pampy noted that the efforts revolved around an effective communication plan were both Outreach and VTA staff sent out mailings to community organizations alerting them to the new eligibility process.  Ms. Pampy noted the internal training to VTA Information Service Representatives in customer service and that all of VTAs operators were provided with additional ADA Paratransit Id Card information to advise them of the pass.  Ms. Pampy noted that Outreach sent out notices and brochures regarding the re-certification process to inform customers to initiate the re-certification process thru the new certification vendor.  Ms. Pampy noted that the re-certification notice process will continue throughout the estimated three-year window for eligibility.  Disabled services at Orthopedic Hospital assume sending the notice effective last week and will continue for the duration of the three-year period.  Ms. Pampy noted that actual live interviews began on July 21, 2003.  Ms. Pampy noted that 95 applicants were interviewed and 85 applicants completed the process.  Ms. Pampy added that 59 were new applicants, 21 re-certified applicants.  Ms. Pampy noted that a total of 75 applicants were certified eligible and 6 non-eligible.  Ms. Pampy noted that l of 6 non-eligible applicants requested an appeal and is scheduled for an appeals interview and functional reassessment later this month in August 2003. 

George Tacké, Accessible Services Manager and Staff Liaison, noted that CTA Chairperson Randy Tamez completed the re-certification process.   Mr. Tacké noted that the disable services at Orthopedic Hospital sent out 51 re-certification application packets and 719 new application packets for the month of July 2003.  Mr. Tacké noted that VTA staff will provide off site presentations regarding the
certification process and how to apply for ADA paratransit services.  Mr. Tacké noted that Paulette Mulligan, VTA Accessible Services staff, is staffing the accessible services hotline. 

Member Slack queried on how the certification interviews were going.   Ms. Pampy noted that the interviews were going well.  Member Slack requested updates on the logistical issues of the certification process and queried if the interview information was being maintained.  Ms. Pampy noted that the vendor will provide data base information regarding the interview rejections/denials to the CTA Members.  Ms. Pampy noted that staff will meet with the vendor regarding an update on the certification process interviews.

Member Otis took her seat at 1:18 p.m.

Member Morrow requested that the Eligibility Certification Program Update presentation be sent out via e-mail to all CTA Committee Members.

Ms. Mulligan provided an update on the accessible services hotline.   Ms. Mulligan noted that the hotline has been available since July 8, 2003, and the number is printed on the Eligibility Certification Program brochure.  Ms. Mulligan noted a total of 329 calls received in a six-week period.  Ms. Mulligan added that 260 calls were related to questions regard individual need for paratransit services and requests for brochures.  Ms. Mulligan noted that 23 calls were from agencies and hospitals requesting large amounts of brochures and 18 calls were unrelated to paratransit services.  Ms. Mulligan noted 14 calls were complaints.  Ms. Mulligan added that Accessible Services was planning to do community outreach with social workers to assists their clients as well to provide correct information regarding paratransit services.  Ms. Mulligan noted that a total of 675 certification brochures were mailed out. 

Mr. Tacké noted that CTA Chairperson Randy Tamez went through the re-certification process and was re-certified.   Mr. Tacké noted that staff is not encouraging the community-at-large to use e-mail or accessibility version to go through the certification process.  Mr. Tacké noted that the intention is  to use the brochure to fill out the application unless the applicant has a disability that would make this difficult for them to complete the process. 

Member Julian requested an Eligibility Certification Program brochure as reference.   Mr. Tacké noted that the brochure will be provided.

Ms. Applegate noted that the SVILC has not received a letter regarding the community outreach presentation on the certification process.   Ms. Applegate wanted to know how many agencies received the community outreach presentation letter.  Ms. Applegate noted her concern with the brochure statement if you are able to use VTA Bus and Light Rail Services then you may not be eligible for VTA Paratransit services.  Ms. Applegate added that the brochure statement negates the whole conditional eligibility because individuals have good and bad days and requested clarification on the statement. 

Mr. Tacké noted that the brochure statement was discussed at length both at the CTA meeting and workshop.   Mr. Tacké noted that staff wanted something to stand out to get the message across that paratransit services are intended for individuals who cant use public transit.  Mr. Tacké noted that SVILC is on the mailing list and that 1600 notices were sent out regarding the presentation. 
Mr. Tacké noted that several hundred notices were sent out specifically to health care providers, community organizations and service agencies.  Mr. Tacké noted that another notice will be mailed on September 2, 2003.

Member Morrow queried on accessible information and requested that the application process be accessible to applicants via the website as well as downloadable files for information.   Mr. Tacké noted that operationally and administratively the process works better to have the postcard sent to Orthopedic Hospital.  Mr. Tacké noted that the postcard is a simpler process but noted that staff will not deny anyone who needs the accessible process.

Member Morrow requested that staff look into the Federal Government and their guidelines regarding downloadable forms that can be accessible and noted that Orthopedic Hospital can work with on-line services.   Mr. Tacké noted that an electronic application can be used to complete the application process.

Member Eljas requested that the accessible services hotline presentation presented by Ms. Mulligan be sent out via e-mail to all CTA Committee Members.

Member Julian expressed his concern regarding accessibility issues and the need to have these issues addressed.

Member Rhodes inquired on how the accessible services hotline is being publicized.   Mr. Tacké noted that the accessible services hotline number is in the certification brochure and posted on the Outreach website and VTA website.
Mr. Tacké noted that VTAs customer service number is publicized.  Mr. Tacké noted that he would look into the possibility of publicizing the accessible services hotline number.

Member Rhodes expressed her concern regarding receiving the certification application in a zip file.   Mr. Tacké noted that the application should have been sent out as an attachment. 

Member Jensen queried on the certification brochure statement wording regarding paratransit eligibility and requested clarification and wanted to know if the hotline has received any calls regarding the statement.   Ms. Mulligan noted only one call as to date. 

Mr. Tacké noted that notices will be mailed out on September 2, 2003, regarding presentation requests on the certification process and paratransit services. 
Mr. Tacké noted that requests for the presentation can be made through the accessible services hotline. 

Member Rhodes queried on re-certification applicants and if they have to request a certification application brochure.   Ms. Pampy noted that the re-certification letters include the certification application.  Mr. Tacké noted that the amount of new applicants is higher than normal; therefore, community outreach efforts are paying off.  Member Slack queried on the re-certification applicant and if they are notified automatically.  Mr. Tacké noted that everyone receives a 90-day notice regarding re-certification.  Mr. Tacké added that everyone will receive a 30-day notice reminder as well.  Mr. Tacké noted that temporary applicants do not receive notices.  Member Rhodes queried on notification by e-mail or phone.   Mr. Tacké noted that notification by e-mail is possible but customers will not be notified by phone.  Member Morrow requested an update on the program. 
Mr. Tacké noted that staff will come back with new information to report to members when significant changes occur or can be provided in staffs report.  Member Morrow requested that the information be provided in written form.

Member Stahl inquired on CTA Chairperson Tamezs re-certification interview.   Mr. Tacké noted that Chairperson Tamez will provide information to CTA Committee Members regarding the re-certification interview and noted that Chairperson Tamez was re-certified. 

Mr. Giuffre queried if he would be receiving his re-certification notification letter.   Mr. Tacké noted that 90-day notices will be sent out to remind individuals to initiate re-certification process. 

Member Jensen queried if CTA Members can receive a copy of the questions asked at the certification interview.   Mr. Tacké noted his concern regarding asking for a copy of the questions and added that staff would like to avoid the intense public scrutiny of questions and answers regarding the certification interview process.  Mr. Tacké noted that staff would like to see how the interview process works.  Mr. Tacké noted that the vendor is bidding to other companies and probably does not want to tip there card to other competitors regarding their interview questions.  Member Morrow cautioned staff regarding usage of the word scrutinize and noted that the CTA Members are not scrutinizing but are informed consumers.   Member Slack queried on the application and wanted to know if the same questions on the application are asked at the interview.  Mr. Tacké noted that the questions they ask are related to day-to-day activities.  Mr. Tacké noted that a set of core questions are asked then there are a set of different questions and that the goal is to confirm eligibility.  Member Slack hopes that the certification interview does not come across as intimidating.  Mr. Tacké responded that the interview itself may be intimidating to the applicants because of the personal questions being asked but noted that the vendor is service oriented and trying to get basic answers to questions to make an assessment.

Member Eljas noted that she is unable to fill out an application brochure.  Mr. Tacké noted that she could fill out an electronic version of the brochure application.   Member Eljas queried on how an individual would know about alternative versions of the brochure application for individuals with disabilities.  Mr. Tacké noted that they would have to call the hotline or accessible services to inquire.  Mr. Tacké noted that SVILC teach, educate, and orientate people to advocate for their own needs.  Member Julian noted that he is unable to fill out forms or use a computer he uses voice recognition and queried on who he could contact to help him fill out the brochure.  Mr. Tacké noted that staff does not have the answer and that staff is doing their best to make these products available to the community.  Mr. Tacké noted that staff does recognize that people have a broad range of needs and staff is able to handle a portion.  Member Julian noted that someone could tape record the answers to process the application brochure.  Member Otis noted that she has a problem with lengthy applications and that the issue has been resolved by someone willing to take the application over the phone.  Mr. Tacké noted that staff may be able to perform some duties.  Member Julian noted that staff could contact an organization and train the individuals to help with the function.  Mr. Tacké noted staff will look into this issue.

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Eligibility Certification Program Update was received and filed.

  
7. January 2004 Transit Service Reduction Plan

Bill Capps, Service Planning Manager, provided a brief overview on the January 2004 Transit Service Reduction Plan.   Mr. Capps noted VTAs financial crisis and noted the two-year budget and plan to get VTA through the financial crisis.  Mr. Capps noted the ten public community meetings in May and June 2003.  Mr. Capps noted that modifications were made to address the issues received from the comments and that staff tried to keep as much service as viable.  Mr. Capps noted a CEQA process and noted that a plan was devised and is posted on the web regarding declaring a financial emergency that is being forward to the Board of Directors for approval at the October Board Meeting regarding a plan to advance funding from the 2000 Measure A to help offset some of the operational deficits.  Mr. Capps noted that if approved by the courts then staff will be able to avoid a drastic cut in service for the time being and only move forward a 3 percent cut in service.  If not approved then will implement the 21 percent service reduction in January 2004.  Mr. Capps noted that even if the court approves funding the operational deficit it will only help the 2004 2005 fiscal years.  Mr. Capps noted that VTA will still have to address the operational deficit and generate a new revenue source or face a service reduction in the future.   Mr. Capps noted that the strategy is to buy VTA two years and the goal is to come up with a new revenue source to cover operational deficits.  Mr. Capps noted that the goal is to place something on the November 2004 ballot to generate new source of revenue to offset operational costs.  Member Morrow expressed concern regarding the service cut to Line 68 to Kaiser facility.  Member Morrow noted that the service reduction to Line 68 will no longer operate on Cottle Road.  Member Morrow noted that the service cut will impact customers.  Mr. Capps noted that Line 68 operating on Skyway, Snell and Santa Teresa and continues on its normal route.   Mr. Capps noted that the Kaiser clinic will require a transfer to Line 27, which does continue to travel on Cottle Road. 

Member Morrow requested that the minutes reflect that it will be a large distance for individuals to walk from the stop to the clinic.

Mr. Capps noted that there will be additional transfers that will be required as a result from the service reductions. Mr. Capps noted that the service reductions impact service and the customers.   Member Morrow noted his concern regarding bringing BART to San Jose while the people of this County are suffering.  Member Slack queried on the timeframe when the courts ruling regarding 2000 Measure A and queried on what other source of significant revenue has been identified to preclude the service reduction.  Mr. Capps noted that a ballot measure is the goal plan for the November 2004 ballot.  Member Slack noted the impact of the service reduction to the customers.  Member Slack noted his disbelief that staff has not been able to find other ways to raise money other than borrow money from 2000 Measure A.  Member Slack noted his concern that VTA is not proactive about finding other revenue sources.  Member Slack requested that staff address the CTA Committee regarding a back up plan to the 2000 Measure A plan.   Mr. Tacké noted several alternate sources to address the operational deficit issue; such as, gas tax initiative, sales tax and payroll tax.  Mr. Tacké noted that the best forum is the Ad-Hoc Financial Stability Committee and noted that CTA Chairperson Tamez still attends the meetings.   Member Stahl queried on what a person is to do if a bus line no longer exists in their area.  Mr. Capps noted Outreach as an option if they meet the qualifications and noted that there are areas in the County that no longer have service.  Mr. Capps noted the strategy process is to identify the service reductions and try to leave the network in tact but noted that some lines did get trimmed but for the most part staff tried to keep the network in tact.  Mr. Capps noted an increase in the number of transfers and waiting times and added that staff strived to achieve a balance.

Member Gouveia left her seat at 2:04 p.m.

Member Gouveia took her seat at 2:10 p.m.

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the January 2004 Transit Service Reduction Plan was received and filed.

  
8.

Segway Human Transporter Overview

George Tacké, Accessible Services Manager and Staff Liaison, provided a brief overview on the Segway Human Transporter.   Mr. Tacké noted that in April 2003 the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) acting on behalf of their Elderly and Disabled Advisory Committee (EDAC) sent letters to all Bay Area transit operators urging them to consult with their respective senior and disabled advisory committees regarding any perceived safety issues with the operation of the Segway Human Transporter (Segway) in a transit environment.  Mr. Tacké noted that a demonstration of the Segway was presented at the July 9, 2003
CTA Workshop Meeting.  Mr. Tacké noted that a public relations representative demonstrated the operation of the Segway and provided CTA Committee Members and guests an opportunity to operate the Segway.  Mr. Tacké noted concerns and comments presented by the CTA Committee Members regarding Segways or Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Devices (EPAMDs) manufactured by Segway LLC.  Mr. Tacké requested that CTA Committee Members provide input regarding the use of the Segway in a transit environment and noted that any position taken by the CTA Committee regarding the Segway will be considered during potential future VTA policy development on the use of EPAMDs on transit vehicles, in transit centers, on light rail station platforms, and at bus stops.  Mr. Tacké noted that AC Transit has not yet addressed the use of EPAMDs on its buses.  Mr. Tacké noted that SamTrans has taken an initial internal step of prohibiting the use of EPAMDs on the systems buses.  Mr. Tacké noted that BART, Innovative Mobility Research (IMR), Caltrans and Segway have implemented a pilot program designed to evaluate the use of EPAMDs in a shared-use application to complete trips to and from transit stations and for daily errands. 

Member Slack queried when is the appropriate time to evaluate and make an educated decision regarding the Segway and noted his opposition to the use of the Segway in a transit environment; however, urged the CTA Members to come together to determine a consensus on the issue.   Member Julian noted his concerns regarding the use of the Segway on sidewalks and noted that the Segway will be competing for space on the sidewalks, buses, and light rail.  Member Julian noted his opposition to the use of Segways in a transit environment.  Member Julian noted his concern regarding the lack of noise made from the Segway and the potential for negative impact.  Member Julian added that the senior/disabled community should be given the preferred status and noted the need for more comprehensive study on the Segway.

Vice Chairperson Grant requested that members forward their comments regarding support or opposition to the Segway to Mr. Tacké and that staff come back with some information for CTA Members.

Member Otis noted her concern regarding the Segway and requested clarification regarding special laws or codes.   Mr. Tacké noted that the codes mentioned by the Segway representative refer to the issue that the Segway be treated as a pedestrian and not a wheelchair.  Mr. Tacké noted that each local jurisdiction has to decided if the use of the Segway be allowable.   Mr. Tacké noted that San Francisco is not going to allow it to be used in a transit environment.  Member Jensen noted that it should be treated as bikes and added that it is short sighted to not think that people would not want to use it like a bike on transit.  Member Rhodes noted that the Segway example was not the standard Segway and that the smaller Segways may not be stable.  Member Heatley noted safety issues and retrofitting for this technology.

Vice Chairperson Grant requested that the Segway Human Transporter Overview be deferred to the next CTA Meeting for further discussion.

Mr. Tacké noted that the item should be returned to Committee for further discussion and noted that the September 10, 2003 CTA Meeting may be cancelled.   Mr. Tacké noted that the priority list dissolved and items of concern and referral were developed as a regular agenda item for CTA.  Mr. Tacké noted that this is a preliminary first step in developing policies regarding the Segway.  Mr. Tacké noted that a working group could meet in September to discuss the Segway Human Transporter and forward the information to the October 8, 2003 CTA Meeting.   Mr. Tacké noted that the consensus would become a part of the public record and that staff would let MTC know CTAs responses.  Mr. Tacké noted that a workgroup of 10 or less could meet and discuss the issues and concerns then summarized by the workgroup then brought back to the whole committee for discussion.

CTA Committee Members expressed their concern and extensive discussion ensued regarding the use of Segway or EPAMDs in a transit environment.

Member Orillinada requested that the CTA Members make a stand regarding the Segway and agendized the item for the October CTA Meeting.

CTA Committee Members expressed their concern regarding the priority list of items and noted the need to create an agenda item list.

Member Eljas noted that it is time for CTA Members to reassess and address concerns that impact the senior/disabled community.

Member Rhodes noted her concern regarding the lack of calling out stops. 

Member Jensen noted that CTA Members did create a list of agenda items for CTA and requested that the agenda item list be discussed at the same time as the Segway Human Transporter Overview.

Mr. Tacké noted that the CTA Committee may bring issues forward for consideration through Items of Concern and Referral to Administration.

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Segway Human Transporter Overview was received and filed.

            The Agenda was taken out of order.

  
14.

Items of Concern and Referral to Administration

Member Morrow requested that staff research Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Guidelines regarding calling out stops and provide a document on what FTA has stated on calling out stops.  Mr. Tacké noted Member Morrows request regarding the implementation regulations of the ADA that the FTA has produced with regard to transit operator requirements to call stops.  Vice Chairperson Grant requested an update on the automated calling out stops system that was scheduled to be installed over two years ago.

Members Liebetrau and Otis requested that the Segway Human Transporter Overview be brought back to the September or October CTA Meeting for discussion.

Member Bruntz requested additional information regarding the Segway trend.

Member Gouveia requested that Agenda Items # 9 thru # 14 be re-agendized for the September CTA Meeting.

Member Stahl queried on Phase III Paratransit Service Business Practices Improvement Plan and Fare Modifications.   Mr. Tacké responded that Phase III implementation will be complete as of October 13, 2003.

Member Liebetrau suggested time limits placed on agenda items.

  
9.

Fiscal Year 2003 Accessible Services Performance Report

M/S/C (Liebetrau/Otis) to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2003 Accessible Services Performance Report.

  
10.

Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Elderly/Disabled Advisory Committee Report

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Elderly/Disabled Advisory Committee Report was deferred.

  
11.

Legislative Updates

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Legislative Updates were deferred.

  
12.

Committee Staff Report

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Committee Staff Report was deferred.

  
13.

Chairpersons Report

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the Chairpersons Report was deferred.

  
15.

Announcements

There were no Announcements.

  
16.

ADJOURNMENT

On order of Vice Chairperson Grant, there being no objection, the meeting was adjourned at 3:05 p.m.

                  Respectfully submitted,

 

                  Michelle Garza, Board Assistant

                  VTA Board of Directors