line
VTA Logo Tasman East / Capitol Light Rail to the East Valley - Now Open Search typed text
Project HomespaceUpdatesspaceMapsspaceCommunityspaceContact Usspace
Project HomespaceProject DescriptionspaceProject StatusspaceFAQspaceLibraryspace
      Home  >  Studies and Projects  >  Tasman East/Capitol  >  Project  >  Tasman East Light Rail Project Environmental Assessment
 

Tasman East Light Rail Project Environmental Assessment

An Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the overall Tasman Corridor Project was certified by the VTA Board of Directors in 1993. The EIR/EIS evaluated the Tasman East and Tasman West segments as one project. A Supplemental EIR/Environmental Assessment was approved by the Board in 1995. This environmental document evaluated proposed design changes to the overall Tasman Corridor Project that occurred during final design for the project.

The environmental documents for the Tasman Corridor Project included an evaluation of impacts and mitigation measures for the following topics:

  • land acquisitions and displacements
  • land use
  • air quality
  • noise
  • water quality
  • wetlands
  • flooding
  • navigable waterways and coastal zones
  • ecologically sensitive areas
  • endangered species
  • traffic and parking
  • energy requirements and potential for conservation
  • historic, archaeological, and parkland resources
  • construction
  • aesthetics
  • community disruption
  • safety and security
  • secondary development
  • consistency with local plans
  • hazardous materials
  • cumulative impacts

return to top

Capitol Corridor Light Rail Project
Environmental Assessment

The environmental impact evaluation process has been completed for the Capitol Corridor Light Rail Project.

The Notice of Preparation for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was circulated to responsible and trustee agencies and the public on June 30, 1999, the Draft EIR (DEIR) was circulated on November 8, 1999, and the public hearing was held on December 2, 1999. The Final EIR (FEIR) was circulated on February 10, 2000.

The FEIR contains the information in the DEIR, written comments received from responsible agencies and the general public during the public comment period for the DEIR, as well as verbal comments taken at the DEIR public hearing on December 2, 1999. VTA’s written responses to those comments follow each comment letter.

On March 2, 2000, the VTA Board of Directors certified that the Final Environmental Impact Report: 1) meets the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2) represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency; 3) was presented to the Board of Directors and that they reviewed and considered it.

In addition, the Board adopted Findings of Fact for each significant effect. For those findings that could not be mitigated to below a level of significance, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was prepared which documents how the benefits of the project outweigh the effects. Then a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that outlines when and how the project mitigation measures are to be implemented was adopted and the project approved.

The table below describes impacts and mitigation measures as presented in the Capitol Corridor Light Rail Project EIR. This table is from the EIR prior to approval of the project. The project is no longer proposed but is an actual project.

return to top

TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.1-a The number of year 2005 study area intersections with AM and PM peak hour levels of service E or F reduces to 9 with the Project as compared to 41 without the Project. In addition, the Project does not cause an intersection to operate with a significant delay or decline in LOS. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.1-b The number of year 2015 study area intersections with AM and PM peak hour levels of service E or F reduces to 14 with the Project as compared to 47 without the Project. In addition, the Project does not cause an intersection to operate with a significant delay or decline in LOS. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.1-c The year 2005 and 2015 freeway traffic would not be adversely impacted by the proposed Project. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.1-d With the addition of the Project’s median, local access would require minor changes in trip length and/or route trips. (Less Than Significant Impact) No mitigation is required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.1-e School and emergency vehicle access would not be substantially affected. (Less Than Significant Impact) No mitigation is required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.1-f The Project improves pedestrian and bicycle accessibility. (Beneficial Impact) Mitigation is not required. Beneficial Impact
Impact 3.1-g The traffic queuing at the freeway and arterials would improve or not change substantially with the Project. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.1-h The Project would remove 217 on-street parking spaces on Capitol Avenue and result in a projected shortfall of 84 parking spaces. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) The proposed Project will retain 110 on-street parking spaces but still result in a shortfall. (Significant And Unavoidable Impact) Significant And Unavoidable Impact
Impact 3.1-i The park-and-ride lots provide adequate supply to meet the demand. (No Impact) Mitigation is not required. No Impact

return to top

AIR QUALITY
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.2-a Operation of the Project would not substantially effect local air quality or contribute to the exceedance of CO standards. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.2-b Operation of the Project would contribute to an overall reduction in regional emissions. (Beneficial Impact) Mitigation is not required. Beneficial Impact
Impact 3.2-c The Project would conform with BAAQMD’s 97' CAP and the CCAA. (No Impact)
Mitigation is not required. No Impact

return to top

NOISE AND VIBRATION
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.3-a The proposed Project would result in significant noise impacts to approximately 51 single family and 88 multi-family residences. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Noise levels shall be mitigated by providing noise insulation and/or sound fences/walls for residences along Capitol Avenue that are significantly impacted. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.3-b Since, the trackway is straight, wheel squeal noise impact is not an issue for the proposed Project. (No Impact) Mitigation is not required. No Impact
Impact 3.3-c The use of loud warning devices would be minimal for the Capitol Corridor Project. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.3-d Noise impacts from buses and cars at the park-and-ride lots when combined with transit and roadway realignment noise would not increase noise levels more than 2 dBA. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.3-e Because of the adjacent noise sensitive land uses, noise impacts from substations are potentially significant. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Substations shall include noise mitigation to ensure that transformer noise levels do not exceed 45 dBA at the nearest indoor noise sensitive receptor. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.3-f Groundborne vibration from transit operations is of such a low level that there would be no potential for structural damage to buildings along Capitol Avenue. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact

return to top

LAND USE
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.4-a The proposed Project would be consistent with the overall objectives and policies of the City of San Jose General Plan 2020 as applicable. Substantial conflicts with the General Plan are not anticipated. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.4-b The proposed Project may cause the permanent displacement of residential households in up to fifteen dwelling units (including six apartment units) and up to ten commercial businesses. However, the owners and occupants would be eligible for assistance under VTA’s Relocation Program. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.4-c The Berryessa Park-And-Ride Lot and Bus Transit Center would be constructed southeast of and adjacent to residential land uses. The implementation of the proposed Park-And-Ride Lot and Bus Transit Center would result in the conversion of an existing agricultural lot. However, the facilities front onto a major arterial, Capitol Avenue, and are located in an urbanized area. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.4-d The Penitencia Creek Park-And-Ride Lot and Bus Transit Center would be constructed southwest of and adjacent to open space land uses (Penitencia Creek Park) and northwest of and adjacent to Public uses (Eastside Union High School District). The implementation of the proposed Park-And-Ride Lot and Bus Transit Center would result in the conversion of an existing public use (the facility would be located on existing Eastside Union High School District property). The proposed facilities would be compatible with other public uses on the east side of Capitol Avenue and separated from uses to the west by a major arterial, Capitol Avenue. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.4-e The McKee Park-And-Ride Lot would be shared parking with the existing Capitol Square Mall shopping center or acquired and would be compatible with the surrounding commercial environment. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.4-f A 60-foot by 200-foot parcel would be used to enable the redesign of the previously approved Alum Rock Park-And-Ride Lot as planned in the Monte Vista Gardens Project. Development of this parcel fronting Capitol Avenue for parking and a traction power substation would be consistent with the existing urbanized setting (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.4-g Traction power substations are proposed at the Berryessa Park-And-Ride Lot, south of Baton Rouge Drive on the west side of Capitol Avenue, and at the Alum Rock Park-And-Ride Lot. The operation of these three substations along Capitol Avenue would result in a minor change to the urbanized environment. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact

return to top

VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.5-a The Project would result in a very small reduction of foraging and/or roosting habitat (less than one-fourth of an acre) available regionally to the following species: American Peregrine Falcon, Willow Flycatcher, western pond turtle, Sharp-shinned Hawk, Merlin, Vaux’s Swift, California Yellow Warbler, Townsend’s big-eared bat, California mastiff bat, and pallid bat. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.5-b Project construction would result in the direct loss of 0.042 acres of tributary waters which is USACE jurisdictional habitat . (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Impacts to USACE jurisdictional areas shall be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio (mitigation:impacts), resulting in the creation of a minimum of 0.084 acres. A detailed restoration plan shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified restoration biologist. This plan shall provide the replacement of lost acreage, linear footage and functions and values of jurisdictional habitat; and the location of restoration opportunities, complete with an analysis of the technical approach to create high quality aquatic and/or wetland habitat. The planned mitigation site is the Tennant Road Marsh which will provide mitigation for all of the riparian and wetland impacts of all of Santa Clara County’s Measure A/B transportation projects.

Prior to construction, the Project proponent shall apply for a permit from the ACOE. The Project proponent will comply with the conditions of the permit.

In addition to the conditions contained in the ACOE permit, the Project proponent will comply with the following additional recommendations. A detailed plan will be created for construction of the mitigation site that includes excavation elevations, location of hydrologic connections and soil amendments, if necessary. Maintenance and monitoring plans will be prepared in consultation with a qualified habitat restoration specialist. Constructed habitats will be monitored for a period of 5 years and the site should achieve the target jurisdictional acreage by Year 5. Specific performance criteria will be determined and monitored for site success. Monitoring reports will be provided annually to the VTA, ACOE, RWQCB and CDFG. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-c A total of 0.088 acres of riparian habitat at Penitencia Creek and 0.058 acres of ruderal habitat at the SCVWD drainage channel would be impacted by the Project as a result of proposed culvert extensions on Capitol Avenue. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Impacts to the riparian habitat and lower quality ruderal habitat that is located within CDFG jurisdiction shall be mitigated at a ratio required by CDFG. In addition, a detailed riparian restoration plan shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified restoration biologist. This plan shall provide for the replacement of lost acreage and values and functions of riparian habitat, and locations of restoration opportunities with a complete analysis of the technical approach to create high quality riparian habitat. The planned mitigation site is the Tennant Road Marsh which will provide mitigation for all of the riparian and wetland impacts of all of Santa Clara County’s Measure A/B transportation projects.

Prior to construction the Project proponent shall apply for and obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFG. The Project proponent shall comply with all conditions of the Agreement.

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-c Continued... In addition to conditions contained in the Streambed Alteration Agreement, the Project proponent shall comply with the following recommendations: riparian plantings shall be in-kind using locally collected plant materials. Non-native species shall be replaced with native species common to the planting area. Planting, maintenance, and monitoring plans shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified habitat restoration specialist. Planting operations shall be monitored for a period of 5 years. Survival of plants originally installed shall not be lower than 80 percent. If at any time during the five-year monitoring period, survival is less than 80 percent then replanting shall occur and the five-year monitoring plan shall begin anew. Monitoring reports shall be provided annually to VTA and CDFG. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)
Impact 3.5-d Project construction activities may degrade water quality at Penitencia Creek. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) The Project applicant will conform to Best Management Practices (BMP) as described under Section 7-1.01G ‘Water Pollution’ (Caltrans 1992). In addition, the following recommendations by the CDFG per the 1601 requirements must be followed regardless if the watercourse on site is dewatered or not in order to comply with proper mitigation measures:

1. No equipment will be operated in the live stream channel.

2. When work in a flowing stream is unavoidable, any stream flow shall be diverted around the work area by a barrier, temporary culvert or a new channel capable of permitting upstream and downstream fish movement.

3. Construction of the barrier or the new channel shall normally begin in the downstream area and continue in an upstream direction and the flow shall be diverted only when construction of the diversion is completed.

4. No debris, soil, silt, sand, bark, slash, sawdust, cement, concrete, washings, petroleum products or other organic or earthen material shall be allowed to enter into or be placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the State. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-e The Project would remove approximately 200 trees along Capitol Avenue, at park-and-ride lots and transit centers and at substations. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) All urban trees that are to be removed or lost due to root severing, etc., shall be replaced. Trees with a diameter less than 12 inches will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. All trees with a diameter of 12 inches or greater will be replaced at a 3:1 ratio. If urban trees (non-natives and ornamentals) are replaced with native trees, a reduced mitigation ratio of 1:1 for all trees smaller than 12 inches in diameter and 2:1 for all trees with a diameter 12 inches or greater will be implemented. These trees shall be irrigated and maintained for a period of not less than three years. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-f Construction of the proposed Project could adversely affect steelhead rainbow trout and chinook salmon in Penitencia Creek. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Shaded riverine aquatic (SRA) habitat that is lost as a result of the Project shall be replaced at a ratio to be arranged with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).

Construction within and along the channel shall be restricted to the dry season (June 1 - October 15, or as arranged with NMFS), the period in which there is minimal water in the channel and in which movement of these species within the Project area is expected to be minimal.

If dewatering of the site occurs, water shall be diverted through the site by way of an open ditch (rather than a pipe) connecting the portions of Penitencia Creek immediately upstream and downstream from the site. This plastic-lined ditch shall be lined also with cobble-sized stones to deter predation by making the trout less conspicuous as they pass through the channel. Water within the ditch shall be at least 12 inches deep, and no impediments to movement, such as high drop structures, shall be present. Alternatively, portable fish ladders may be used on the faces of cofferdams to allow fish to move through the site.

Any concrete poured during widening of the bridge over Penitencia Creek shall be completely dried before it comes into contact with creek waters. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-g Construction of the proposed Project could adversely affect western pond turtles in Penitencia Creek. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated)
Implementation of Mitigation 3.5-f will maintain connectivity of the channel and allow pond turtles to move through the site during construction. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-h Construction of the proposed Project could adversely affect red-legged frogs in Penitencia Creek. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Preconstruction surveys for red-legged frogs shall be conducted for three nights prior to construction in and along the Penitencia Creek bed. If frogs are found on the site, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will be contacted, and formal consultation with this agency will identify appropriate mitigation to be implemented, if necessary. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-i Construction of the proposed Project could adversely affect nesting raptors such as the White-tailed Kite and Cooper’s Hawk. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated)
Construction shall be scheduled to occur between October and December if feasible, so the nesting season would be avoided, and no impacts to nesting raptors would be expected. However, since it is unlikely that a construction Project of this magnitude could be scheduled between October and December, the following procedure shall be implemented.
Preconstruction surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted by a qualified ornithologist in order to ensure that no raptor nests will be disturbed during Project implementation. This survey should be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of demolition/construction activities during the early part of the breeding season (January through April) and no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding season (May through August). During this survey, the ornithologist would inspect all trees and electrical towers in and immediately adjacent to the impact areas for raptor nests. If an active raptor nest is found close enough to the construction/demolition area to be disturbed by these activities, the ornithologist, in consultation with CDFG, would determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone (typically 250 feet) to be established around the nest. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.5-j Construction of the proposed Project could adversely affect burrowing owls. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) In conformance with federal and state regulations protecting raptors against direct "take," preconstruction surveys for Burrowing Owls shall be conducted by a qualified ornithologist prior to any development within 250 feet of the field on the north side of Penitencia Creek, east of Capitol Avenue. These surveys, which shall include any potentially suitable habitat within 250 feet of construction areas, shall be conducted no more than 30 days prior to the start of site grading, regardless of the time of year in which grading occurs. If breeding owls are located on or immediately adjacent to the site, a construction-free buffer zone (typically 250 feet) around the active burrow must be established as determined by the ornithologist in consultation with CDFG. No activities, including grading or other construction work or relocation of owls, would proceed that may disturb breeding owls.

If owls are resident within 250 feet of the Project area during the nonbreeding season, a qualified ornithologist, in consultation with CDFG, shall passively relocate (evict) the owls to avoid the loss of any individuals if the owls are close enough to Project areas that they or their burrows could potentially be harmed by Project activities. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation

return to top

WATER RESOURCES/DRAINAGE
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.6-a Water quality degradation could occur during light rail operations. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) The Project shall comply with the Clean Water Act including the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.6-b The proposed Project’s drainage facilities are designed for storm water runoff under existing and future land use development. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.6-c The Upper Penitencia Creek bridge would be widened from 80 to 128 feet as part of the proposed Project. This would increase the potential for flooding. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) The Upper Penitencia Creek Bridge design shall be modified to maintain the existing soffit elevation. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.6-d The trackway and station platforms would block sheetflow crossing over Capitol Avenue for 100-year base flood conditions. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated)

VTA will design trackway to allow flood level sheetflow to cross Capitol Avenue. There will need to be a 50% opening in the header wall for a 400 foot stretch between Moorbrook Drive and Berryessa Road (station 835+50 to 839+50) and a 200-foot stretch north of Berryessa Road (station 828+00 to 830+00). This may be accomplished with alternating foot-long breaks along the header wall. Hardscape in landscaped areas will allow sheetflow. The trackway will be designed to minimize contamination of the ballast by the sheetflow. Design will maintain CPUC safety standards for partially separated right of way. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation  


return to top

VISUAL AND AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.7-a The proposed Project would alter the visual characteristics along Capitol Avenue by introducing permanent light rail transit facilities, including stations, park-and-ride lots, transit centers, and substations, into the Project area. However, since Capitol Avenue is a major arterial, these facilities would not be visually inconsistent with the surrounding existing urban environment. In addition, the Alum Rock Park-And-Ride Lot and Transit Center has been incorporated into the approved Monte Vista Gardens Project. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.7-b The Project would remove approximately 200 trees along and adjacent to Capitol Avenue. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) A conceptual Landscaping Plan shall be prepared for the proposed Project and shall be implemented. In addition, Section 3.5, Vegetation and Wildlife, Mitigation 3.5-eg, provides for planting of replacement trees. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.7-c The proposed Project would increase light and glare in the Project area. However, levels of light and glare would not be significantly increased when compared to existing conditions along Capitol Avenue and at adjacent commercial uses. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.7-d The proposed Project would have no effect on Scenic Routes within the City of San Jose. (No Impact) Mitigation is not required. No Impact

return to top

MAGNETIC FIELD HAZARDS
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.8-a The proposed light rail extension would result in a minor increase in magnetic fields along the alignment, when compared to background levels. However, this increase is not anticipated to exceed the 5,000 mG threshold. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact

return to top

ENERGY
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.9-a The Project would result in a minor increase in energy usage by transportation users along the corridor. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required Less Than Significant Impact

return to top

SOILS, GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.10-a Strong ground shaking may occur on the site during the next major earthquake on the regional fault system due to the proximity of the site to earthquake sources in the vicinity. However, the Project shall include earthquake resistant design in accordance with the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code and Caltrans seismic standards. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.10-b Soils along the corridor present a low erosion hazard and on-site topography is relatively flat, which would not create concentrated water flow during or subsequent to grading; therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to erosion. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact

return to top

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.11-a Project grading and construction activities could expose people to existing sources of hazardous materials from documented, regulatory-listed hazardous materials sites. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Prior to construction, a determination shall be made by a qualified environmental assessor (based on field sampling of media, laboratory analysis of samples, visual confirmation of environmental conditions, etc.) as to the nature of environmental risk associated with construction activities at the two identified regulatory-listed hazardous materials sites. A similar determination shall also be made for each of the proposed park-and-ride lot sites. All recommendations of the qualified environmental assessor [e.g., preparation of a health and safety plan (HSP) for the Project, implementation of a soil management work plan (SMWP) for the Project, remediation of affected soil and groundwater, etc.] shall be implemented by VTA and all representatives thereof, including contractors and earthwork construction workers, such that people are not exposed to an environmental condition on the Project site as a result of existing sources of contamination. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.11-b Undocumented waste located on the Project site could present a health risk that would be considered a potentially significant impact unless mitigation is incorporated. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) In the event that an unknown waste or debris is discovered during construction/grading activities by the contractor which is believed to involve hazardous waste and/or materials, the contractor shall:

1. Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area;
2. Notify the Resident Inspector;
3. Secure the area as directed by the Resident Inspector; and
4. Notify the City of San Jose Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator and the San Jose Fire Department. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.11-c Implementation of the Project would result in the demolition of buildings on-site that may contain lead-based paint. This may pose a potential health risk if not properly handled and disposed. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) If during demolition of any building, paint is separated from the building material (e.g. chemically or physically), the paint waste will be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified hazardous materials inspector to determine its proper management. All hazardous materials shall be handled and deposed in accordance with local, state and federal regulations. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.11-d Implementation of the Project would result in the demolition of a building on-site that may contain asbestos. This may pose a potential health risk to people if not properly handled and disposed. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Prior to demolition work, buildings built prior to 1978 shall be sampled as part of an asbestos survey in compliance with the National Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). Those buildings built after 1978 shall be inspected for compliance with the NESHAP. If asbestos is found in the building, asbestos-related work, including demolition, involving 100 square feet or more of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) shall be performed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor under the supervision of a certified asbestos consultant and asbestos shall be removed and disposed of in compliance with applicable State laws. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.11-e Due to the historic use of the area for agricultural production, on-site soils may contain contaminants that could pose a risk to health. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Prior to construction activities, soil samples shall be taken at park-and-ride lot facilities (only where grading is planned) to determine the presence or absence of banned pesticides. If soil samples indicate the presence of any contaminant in hazardous quantities, the RWQCB and DTSC will be contacted to determine the level of any necessary remediation efforts, and these soils shall be remediated in compliance with applicable laws. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation

return to top

CULTURAL RESOURCES
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.12-a The proposed construction could alter the archaeological integrity and data potentials of as yet-unknown subsurface prehistoric and historic archaeological deposits. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) Retain the services of a qualified archaeologist who will be available to VTA for on-call consultation in the event of an inadvertent discovery of cultural resources or for general project review. Construction contract documents shall include standard VTA language that addresses archaeological/historical discoveries. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)
Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.12-b The Project would not alter the Berryessa School, which is eligible for the California/National Register. (No Impact) Mitigation is not required. No Impact.
Impact 3.12-c The Project may result in the removal of a barn associated with the Messina property which is eligible for the California/National Register. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) 3.12-c(1) If feasible, the Project shall be redesigned to avoid removal of the barn on the Messina property. If redesigning the Project is not feasible, the affected building shall be moved to a different location on its current parcel and rehabilitated according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of Interior 1990). Relocation and rehabilitation of the barn would be dependent upon the stability of the structure and the property owner’s cooperation.

3.12-c(2) If relocation of the barn is infeasible due to structural instability or lack of cooperation by the property owner, the affected building shall be documented according to the guidelines in the Historic American Buildings Survey Guidelines for Preparing Written Historical Descriptive Data (Pacific Coast Basin Regional Office, U.S. National Park Service 1993) and the Photographic Specifications - Historic American Building Survey (U.S. National Park Service 1989). A copy of the documentation, with original photo negatives and prints, should be placed in an historical archive or history collection accessible to the general public. Four additional copies should be produced for distribution to other local and regional depositories. Distinctive and/or typical architectural features from the affected building shall be salvaged. Project impacts will be reduced commensurate with the percentage of the existing building that can be incorporated into the design for any new buildings, or otherwise preserved. (Significant And Unavoidable Impact)

Significant And Unavoidable Impact

return to top

CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
REVISED TABLE S2-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROJECT IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
Impact 3.13-a Project construction activities would periodically reduce Capitol Avenue from four lanes to two lanes. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) The VTA, in coordination with and as approved by the City of San Jose, shall prepare specifications for traffic handling that will require the contractor to submit a detailed Traffic Management Plan prepared by a licensed traffic engineer. VTA shall review and shall submit for review and approval to the City of San Jose, the contractor’s Traffic Management Plan.

Once the Traffic Management Plan is approved, the contractor shall prepare and submit traffic control plans, consistent with the Traffic Management Plan, showing in detail k-rail placement, temporary striping, on-street parking as available, placement of construction signs, use of flagmen and other such traffic and safety activities together with a daily construction schedule that will restore traffic capacity during peak periods on weekdays (the morning commute period is 7:00 to 9:00 AM and the evening commute period is 4:00 to 6:00 PM).

VTA shall assign a specific construction management VTA team to oversee construction including contractor compliance to mitigation measures such as adequate flagmen and the contractor’s City-approved traffic control plan.

VTA shall continue to use a team of public outreach staff who will be dedicated to the Capitol Corridor Light Rail Project to proactively inform the public of the ongoing progress and exceptions to the expected plans as well as respond to requests for information and assistance when impacts raise special concerns. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.13-b Large areas of on-street parking would be eliminated immediately after ground breaking for extended periods of time over the duration of construction. However, long-term (three months or more) loss of parking or pedestrian access that is essential for continued operation of businesses should not occur. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact
Impact 3.13-c Project construction activities would generate substantial amounts of dust. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction of the Project as outlined in the BAAQMD Guidelines:

1. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily.
2. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
3. Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (nontoxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.
4. Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.
5. Sweep streets daily (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets. (Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation)

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation
Impact 3.13-d Project construction activities may generate substantial intermittent noise levels at nearby residential areas. (Potentially Significant Impact If Not Mitigated) 3.13-d(1) At locations where the Project includes sound fences/walls, they will be constructed as a first task so as to provide noise reduction to adjacent residences during construction whenever possible.

3.13-d(2) Pile-driving will be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday at Penitencia Creek.

3.13-d(3) Where practical, construction operations will be restricted to minimize noise and traffic impacts in coordination with and as approved by the City of San Jose under an encroachment permit. This measure applies only at locations where there are adjacent sensitive receptors (e.g., residences).

3.13-d(4) Equipment will use available noise suppression devices and properly maintained mufflers. Construction noise will be reduced by using quiet or "new technology", equipment, particularly the quieting of exhaust noises by use of improved mufflers where feasible. All internal combustion engines used at the Project site will be equipped with the type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment will be maintained in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive-train and other components.

3.13-d(5) Staging of construction equipment and unnecessary idling of equipment within (200 feet) of noise-sensitive land uses will be avoided whenever feasible.

3.13-d(6) Temporary sound fences/walls/barriers/enclosures will be erected around stationary construction equipment when such equipment will be operated for an extended period of time and where there are noise sensitive receptors substantially affected. Noise barriers and enclosures shall consist of absorptive material in order to prevent impacts upon other land uses due to noise reflection. In addition, complete enclosure structures shall close or secure any openings where pipes, hoses or cables penetrate the enclosure structure.

3.13-d(7) Notification shall be given to residents within 300 feet of major noise generating activities alerting them of planned construction activities. The notification shall also describe the noise abatement measures that will be implemented, as well as note the infeasibility of other measures that were considered but rejected. (Significant And Unavoidable Impact)

Significant And Unavoidable Impact
Impact 3.13-e The Project would require the relocation of a number of utility lines along the alignment. However, no disruption of any utility service(s) for an extended period of time (i.e., more than 24 hours) would be expected to occur. (Less Than Significant Impact) Mitigation is not required. Less Than Significant Impact

return to top 

 


   VTA.org Home
Tasman East/Capitol Project Home   |   Updates   |   Maps   |   Community   |   Contact Us